Proposals must include a plan for determining the degree to which objectives are met and methods are followed. This section is extremely important as funders pay particular attention to evaluation methods, since they need help determining whether a proposed project represents an intelligent investment for them. The evaluation section should meet the following criteria:
Presents a plan for evaluating accomplishment of objectives
Presents a plan for evaluating and modifying methods over the course of the program
Explains who will be doing the evaluation and how they were chosen
Clearly states evaluation criteria
Describes how data will be gathered
Explains any test instruments or questionnaires to be used
Describes the process of data analysis
Shows how evaluation will be used for program improvements
Describes any evaluation reports to be produced
For this Discussion, keep these evaluation criteria in mind as you review the two grant applications listed in the Learning Resources. Two applications were submitted. Only one can receive the grant funds. Based on the information you have available, and using the evaluation rubric for each grant application, determine which one of the grants you believe should receive funding.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post two reasons why you selected the grant that you choose to fund and two reasons why you chose not to fund the other grant. Then, briefly explain two grant-writing strategies that you might recommend to improve the unsuccessful proposal.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources
Required readings and citations
Institute of Medicine. (2003). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academyof Sciences. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Chapter 2, The Healthcare Environment and Its Relation to Disparities
Shining Beacon Community Services Center. (2001). Shining light: Anger management for women. Retrieved from http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=331613513571494&id=260537440679102
HIV Awareness Project. (n.d.). HIV prevention and planning coalition. Retrieved from http://thegrantdoctor.com/samples/sample-proposal-aids-hiv-prevention-grant/Sample-Proposal-AIDS-HIV-Prevention2.html
National Science Foundation. (n.d.). Grant proposal guide. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpgprint.pdf
Grant-Proposal Guide – NSF 11-1 by The National Science Foundation.
Honeycutt, A. A., Clayton, L., Khavjou, O., Finkelstein, E. A., Prabhu, M., Blitstein, J. LRenaud, J. M. (2006, March). Guide to analyzing the cost-effectiveness of community public health prevention approaches. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/06/cphpa/report.pdf
Guide to Analyzing the Cost-Effectiveness of Community Public Health Prevention Approaches by Wilma Tilson, M.P.H., 2006. RTI Project Number 0208827.001 – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Source: http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/06/cphpa/report.pdf
Document: Scholar-Practitioner Project (SPP) Guidelines
Document: Grant Evaluation Rubric: Grant 1
Document: Grant Evaluation Rubric: Grant 2
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.[order_calculator]