Author: chris

 Researcher B conducts a cross-sectional study to explore the relation between consumption of fruits and vegetables and the risk of prostate cancer. The results of the study indicate a higher risk of cancer with fruit and vegetable consumption than without. From the information provided, what do these two studies tell you about the risk of cancer? Share your thoughts and opinions on each study in terms of study design, demographics, and the additional information needed to arrive at a conclusion. Justify your response using examples and reasoning. Comment on the postings of at least two classmates, explaining whether you agree or disagree with their views.:

This essay discussed how stigma and discrimination limit the rehabilitation process of a person with psychiatric disability

A fundamental part of ethics is the search for the good life and how to live rightly.Most of us have goals and dreams. You probably have a vision of what the good life would look like for you. With this in mind, do you think pluralism would help you to live in a diverse society, one in which other people\’s opinions and lifestyles may clash with your pursuit of the good life? Does relativism offer a better or worse alternative? Explain your reasoning.Your paper should be 2-3 pages in APA format.

a 5- to 7-slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation. the following in your presentation: Was the content of your video a personal crime, property crime, or policy issue?What causal factors were addressed in the video?What policy implications or recommendations were provided in the video to address the crime?Were budgetary or financial issues discussed in the video? If so, elaborate.What future implications were discussed in the video?What other content-specific information is relevant to your selected video?What basic elements of the crime served as the basis for your selected video?What criminological theory or theories best explains the occurrence of this crime or issue?  external research as necessary to support the content of your videosubject matter.major points in the slides. Include detailed explanations in the speaker notes section that correlate to each point.videos, audio, photos, diagrams, or graphs as appropriate. yourpresentation consistent with APA guidelines.  Website of the video:     

Jackson County judges try thousands of cases per year. In an overwhelming majority of the cases disposed, the verdict stands as rendered. However, some cases are appealed, and of those appealed, some of the cases are reversed. Jackie Chan of  conducted a study of cases handled by Jackson County judges over a three-year period. In the Excel file, , linked at the bottom of the page, are the results for the 182,908 cases handled (disposed) by 40 judges in Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Court, and Municipal Court. The purpose of the newspaper\’s study was to evaluate the performance of the judges. The newspaper wanted to know which judges were doing a good job and which ones were making too many mistakes. You are to assist in the data analysis by using your knowledge of probability and conditional probability to help with the ranking of each of the judges, as well as each court.Prepare a report (see below) with your ranking of the judges based on the probabilities and conditional probabilities, as well as the analysis of each court. Include the following seven (7) items in table format to support your ranking.  to use  for your probabilities in the table, as some of them will be quite small.

 Can anyone complete this paper correctly, following all directions, answering all questions, using in-text citations, valid references that are cited correctly, zero plagarims?????  Prepare a brief overview (1 page in length; you may put this in a table or paragraph form) of your results, the conversions, and any differences that occur. Then respond in a 3-5 page, APA formatted paper to the following:

Assume an undercover officer believes Andy is selling narcotics. During his surveillance he observes individuals approach Andy and hand him money. After Andy collects the money he would walk toward a tree and out of the sight of the officer. Andy would then return and hand small packets to the individual. After Tara conducts a transaction w/Andy, the police detain her. On her person is 6 small bags of heroin. Tara told police she purchased the heroin for her boyfriend. When police detain Andy he has $500 on his person but no narcotics. Underneath a rock by the tree where Andy walked to, police found 200 bags of heroin.Possessing narcotics is a misdemeanor and the sale of narcotics is a felony. Remember the case of Porter v.State (the case dealing w/constructive possession) and your readings of possessory criminal liability. Explain fully Andy and Tara\’s criminal liability.2.Please list and explain in detail the four elements of Self- Defense.3.John and Michael are five year members of rival street gangs.Both gangs are extremely violent and have exchanged gunfire numerous times in the past.One day John is walking down the street and Michael ,along w/ two other individuals, are walking on the opposite side. As they pass each other Michael  gave John an intimitating stare. As John quickens his pace, he realizes Michael crossing the street, reach in his waistband, and walk directly towards him. Fearing for his life,John pulls out his gun and kills Michael. No weapon is found on Michael.Does John have a valid \”self defense claim\”? Please explain your legal analyisis.4.Read the case of State v Miranda, 715 A.2d 680(1998). (This was a Connecticut case. Page 96 in Samaha).◦What were the facts in Miranda?◦What was the issue in Miranda?◦What were the trial court findings in Miranda?◦What factors do you believe the trial court took into consideration when they decided Miranda?◦Did the Connecticut Supreme Court uphold the trial court\’s decision?

As you begin preparing for your dissertation, it is critical to have a clear understanding of the role and purpose of the Premise, Prospectus, and Proposal phases of the process. For this Assignment, you will write a brief 1-page paper analyzing the function of each of these steps in the dissertation process.To prepare for this Assignment, review the Learning Resources, focusing on the guidelines for creating the Dissertation Premise, Prospectus, and Proposal. Then, consider the relationship between these three components. How does each contribute to and facilitate the dissertation process?Write a 1-page paper that analyzes the relationship between the Premise, the Prospectus, and the Proposal in the dissertation process and explain why it is necessary to develop all three. Assignment Rubric: 30 points CATEGORY EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR SCORE Content (24 possible points) Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources.Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. (22-24 points) Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources.Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. (19-21 points) Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources.Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. (17-18 points) Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources.Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. (0–16 points) Writing (6 possible points) Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.Paper contains Paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors and/or somewhat lessPaper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, or APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderatePaper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing or relies excessively on quoting.Paper may contain few or no quality resources. (0–2points) © 2015 Laureate Education, Inc.Page 1 of 2 CATEGORY EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR SCORE multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.(6 points) than the expected number of or type of sources. (5 points) reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).(4 points) Instructor comments:Total Score (30 possible points): poin