Author: custom-essay

An engineer has been involved in the design of many large reservoir spillways for flood control and water-supply dams. The engineer attends a workshop on the subject and based on the material presented, deduces that he has not been applying the design concepts correctly. After the workshop, he does some calculations and determines that, while almost all of his past design projects are safe, two spillways may not pass the design discharge that was required. He believes that the dams are safe for the moment, but he believes that they could fail for some floods smaller than the design flood. He recognizes that if he makes it known that the two projects are underdesigned, his reputation will be tarnished, and his company will be responsible for costly retrofitting of the two spillways.

1. What value issues are involved, and how are they in conflict?
2. Are technical issues related to the values issues? If so, in what ay are the technical issues in conflict with the value issues?
3. If the hydrologist attempted to rationalize the situation, what rationalizations might he or she use? Provide arguments to suggest why the excuses represent rationalization.
4. What are the hydrologists alternate courses of action? Identify all alternatives, regardless of the ethical implications.
5. How would you resolve this conflict?

The response must be a minimum of 2 pages, double spaced, 12 pt font. Provide any sources or references that you use. Your grade will be based partially on grammar and flow, but more in ensuring that all 5 questions are answered thoughtfully and reasonably.

This paper has to detail the rising threat and increasing ability of Iran as a cyber security threat. This paper also has to detail Iran\’s cyber structure including the High Council of cyberspace and Iran\’s Cyber Army. 12 pt font.

in the response,state which artist and work of art and the date, give a link to where the work can be viewed and /or heard. using the terminology from book, explain why the piece is a work of art as opposed to not a work of art. any sources used must be cited in text and on the works cited in MLA format.

You are a defense attorney in the trial of United States v. Taylor Stark and Jane Stark, who have been charged with violations of four federal criminal laws: violations of the anti-bribery and books and records provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, insider trading in violation of Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act, obstruction of justice under Title 18 U.S.C. 1512, and perjury in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. 1621. Each of the four crimes was charged against at least one, and possibly both, of the two defendants. based on the facts which crimes, if any, the government could bring charges for with respect to each defendant, and then to argue the elements of each violation charged. Neither defendant has been charged with any crimes outside of the four identified here.

a paper, between 7 -10 pages (double-spaced, size 12 font, with 1-inch margins), making a closing argument about why your side should win on these charges analyze the elements of each offense, the substance and persuasiveness of your argument. For the defense attorneys, you should argue that the government has failed to meet its burden on each crime.

Old age is a social construction. Discuss this statement and how it relates to health care for people with dementia in Australia. Support your argument with recent Australian data and a\’s choice

6 pages total
Works cited page MLA style

Refer to the additional materials attached for complete instructions.

Choose two personal goals and two professional goals related to developing a healthy mind. Describe the goals and brainstorm ideas for achieving the goals. Incorporate some real life examples and ways you can work on achieving these goals. Also, include what ifscenarios.
For example, what if you try listening more attentively to your co-worker from the example above, but your mind keeps wandering and you still interrupt her in mid sentence. What can you do to reach this goal?
What would your next plan of action be if your original plan fails?
Create what if scenarios for each of the goals you created. Keep in mind that you should focus on areas that you may be lacking, not on other peoples actions or behaviors you can only change yourself, and you cannot change others even though we may really want to.