Author: custom-essay

1,5002,250-word review of Wilkinsons The Seven Laws of the Learner. The review must be written in current Turabian format and include a summary, critique, and application in addition to a title page and bibliography. The review must address the following:
Summary: 500750 words What is this book about? What are Wilkinson\’s major arguments, and how does he explain/support them?
Critique: 500750 words In what areas do you agree and/or disagree with the authors argument or approach and why? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the book.
Application 500750 words In what ways will you apply the principles from this book to your own life and teaching?
Each section of your paper must be clearly indicated using proper, current Turabian style and section headings (Summary, Critique, Application). This book was purchased and used on order# 916223368.

Dead White Men & Other Important People

Task: Answer questions A and B, for both quotes. Provide a reference list of all sources used, including Dead White Men & Other Important People (Bancroft & Fevrre, 2016) at the end.

Question A. 300 words
Quote 1:
There are two explanations sociologists have used for this, both relying on the idea that there are no inherent bodily responses that are not learned or socially mediated or constructed. One is that we put very different interpretations on the same set of bodily responses depending on the situation we are in (p.43)

What big idea or theory explored in Dead White Men & Other Important People (Bancroft & Fevre, 2016) does this quote refer to? Identify the theory (and theorist) and explain your understanding of it.

You must refer to Bancroft & Fevre 2016 in your explanation. You may refer to other sources you have read as well. You must use in-text citation (Harvard style). (The folder is saved as
\’Dead White Men and Other Important People\’ inlcuding the weblinks for the amount pages)

Question B. 300 words
Quote 2: Well, thats part of Webers theory too: the workers worked hard because they thought it was their duty to God and the only way to be saved p.193( The folder is saved as
\’Dead White Men and Other Important People\’ inlcuding the amount of pages too)

How relevant is this theory to society today?
You must support your answer with examples, referenced where appropriate. You can use examples from:
your own experiences (Must use)
observations of contemporary society (must use)
characters and storyline from Dead White Men & Other Important People (Bancroft & Fevre, 2016) (must use)
other academic sources you have read. (Optional)

Your answers should be organised into coherent paragraphs, written in appropriate academic English and use in-text citation (Harvard style) where appropriate.

1. Content and task completion
2. Use of core text and referencing
3. Organisation, style and language.

have attached the directions to the essay and the graded essay and would like someone to rewrite mine that is already done to the standards the teacher is wanting. I guess there can be additional info added to what I already did to complete her 5 paragraph request.

-double space between paragraphs
-Your essay must have an interesting and original title. Also, remember that titles should all be in capitals(first letters of words), except words of less than four lettersunless those small words come at the end or beginning of the title.
Proofread your essay carefully.
If you use dialogue, you should format it correctly. You need to start a new paragraph every time you change speakers.
-I want you to incorporate into your essay at least one simile.
Your essay should have a strong opening paragraph and a strong closing paragraph. The opening paragraph should draw your reader in. Do not, under any circumstances, say: In this essay I am going to write about my father (etc). Your opening paragraph can either be analytical or narrative, or anecdotal.
-below (or in the following attachment for a clearer version), I gave you questions and I want you to answer all the questions on the next page of the essay.

l. What is your favorite part of the paper? Be specific. Your least favorite? Why for both.
2. THESIS. What is the main idea of this essay, or, put in another way, what does the reader take with him/her after reading the paper? Each person in the group should try to state this thesis as clearly as possible to the writer of the paper, so the writer KNOWS what you GET out of his/her paper. Is this idea clearly in the paper, either implicitly stated or explicitly stated? If it is not clear, how could it be brought out more fully?
3. Where in the essay could there be more description and detail? What are more interesting ways to get more description and detail into the paper? (For example, use dialogue, metaphor, simile, imagery, use of incidents, specific objects. Avoid the words, THINGS and STUFF. Be more specific. SHOW US, EARN THE RIGHT TO SAY IT.)
4. Are the sentences varied, or do they mostly begin the same way? For example, do many sentences in a row begin subject/verb? Are the sentences varied in length? Or are they all very short sentences? Sentence fragments? Or long sentences that may be run-on sentences? How about the tense of the verbs? Consistent? Can you suggest how to change these sentences for smoother, less monotonous reading?
5. Notice how the writer gets from paragraph to paragraph. Do the transitions between paragraphs flow naturally, or are they illogical or too abrupt? Is there an over-abundance of words like moreover, therefore, however, nevertheless, regardless? Suggest changes. Notice how the quote is woven into the essay. Is it clumsily done? Is it done correctly according to MLA? Look up MLA and how to do quotes correctly in an essay. Just google MLA. Owl Purdue is a good website for this information.
6. Where does this essay need work in terms of organization? Could paragraphs be switched around? Are there places where there needs to be another paragraph? Are there paragraphs that could be edited out with no loss to meaning or development? TIGHTEN. Dont go on and on about the same thing you have already said. Look closely at the opening paragraph. GET INTO THE PAPER WITH SOMETHING INTERESTING RIGHT AWAY. Forget what you have been taught about the introductory paragraph, about going on and on introducing your subject. GET OUR ATTENTION. The reader would rather eat a cheese sandwich than read your writing. This is harsh but true. Say something specific, real, and stimulating right away. Does this essay hook you in with a lively and interesting opening paragraph? The first sentence should hook the reader, make the reader want to read the rest of the essay. Do not write a boring opening paragraph that basically tells the reader what the essay is going to be about. Jump right in with something interesting, a detail, a vivid description, dialogue.
7. The closing paragraph: \”In conclusion\” does not need to be stated. It should be obvious the paper is coming to a close. Are we left with something to think, to feel, or does the ending paragraph restate everything that\’s already been said? 8. Title: Does the title reflect the thoughts, feelings, mood, main idea (thesis) of the essay? Does it invite you in, shake you up, make you curious, is it interesting? Make suggestions. Do not underline your title. And don\’t put quotation marks around your title unless it includes a direct quote from some other source.
9. A great piece of writing touches the reader on all four levels of human nature: Physical, Intellectual, Emotional/Psychological and Spiritual. Identify in your writing what levels are being touched and say why these levels are being touched.

1.Pick an article from your textbook described above or the following website that interests you(CAN NOT PICK How cells combat chromosome imbalance ): https://www.sciencedaily.com/news/health_medicine/human_biology
2. Brief summary of that article in no fewer than 100 words
3.Go to the Internet and search for opinions about the subject of your article. You MUST use at least two (2) references which are NOT .com or .net websites and write a summarize that information in no fewer than 100 words.
4. Respond to another student. In your response, you must find a website which they did not use and find additional information to add to their post. You may agree or disagree with their post. Say why you agree or disagree.
Students post
(Everyone has cells, which divide into 23 pairs. When these cells divide up, a mistake can happen where they are not divided equally. But now MIT biologists have found a way to destroy these wrong cells and recruit or bring new cells that are good. With this being found, so does the chances of using it to destroy cancer cells. Cancer cells are dangerous as they have allot of chromosomes or the opposite in having almost no chromosomes. When cells fail to divide up properly, aneuploidy occurs which is always fatal to the body. For example, Down syndrome or Edwards syndrome may occur. When cancer cells do this, you can not control the growth of it. When two scientists were studying this, they saw that when chromosomes lead daughter cells to be imbalanced, making everything worse. But they saw that when they exposed these cancer cells to the immune cells that it was naturally killing it.)

Part A: Social Media for Business
Describe the advice and tips that Mark Schaefer, in his book Social Media Explained, gives leaders, executives, professionals, and practitioners about the role of social media for businesses, what to do with it, and how to maximize its use. In this 2-part paper, make your argument using the parameters listed below:
Part A: Social Media for Business (Due Week 3)
Discuss why social media is trending as a key tool in the marketing decisions of most businesses.
Describe how social media works in the business environment.
Consider the types of questions and objections you might encounter when putting together social media initiatives at your organization and how you propose to overcome those obstacles.
Format Requirements: The paper is to be clear and concise, and you will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. The paper is to be no shorter than 7 pages nor longer than 10 pages in length (typed, double-spaced). You will automatically lose points if these limits are not followed. The 7-page minimum does not include the title page, abstract, reference page, or any diagrams, graphs, tables, pictures, charts, etc., that are not pure written text. Incorporate a minimum of at least 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years. Citations should be referenced according to APA style.

The paper should be a Concept paper. Since English isn\’t my first language could you please try to choose simple words in the paper? And make the paper simple and plain instead of complex. he topic choice is yours, and I encourage you to choose a topic that is of interest to you. Select a topic that you are very familiar with. Save the intensive research until later in the semester. If you do consult sources, you MUST credit all sources on a Works Cited page and in the body of the paper when the information is used. As

Report Instructions:
You shall complete this assignment individually.
Once you have completed the in-class EBeer simulation, download the data for your team following the simulation instructions.
Prepare a report of no more than two pages, and no appendices (other than a bibliography of work cited). In this report, discuss what happened in the first round of the simulation, the decisions you made with your team prior to the second round, and then what happened in the second round of the simulation. This is a business report, so be sure to use cost information and any other analyses as appropriate. Explain any differences in performance between the first and second round. Then, present a well-researched write up of the bullwhip effect, focusing on what it is, what causes it, and what companies can do to reduce it.