Please follow these instructions below:
Using two case examples from charities involved in the protection of wildlife, discuss and examine the following debate described in the statement by Minteer and Miller below.
The parks vs. people debate i.e., the dispute over whether conservation projects and policies should prioritize biodiversity and landscape protection or poverty alleviation and human livelihood improvement should be quite familiar to most conservation scientists and policy scholars today. Yet, it is clearly a more expansive debate than the argument over whether a particular conservation project should emphasize biodiversity protection or development: it is also a wider disagreement about the proper value and ethical foundations of biological conservation in the age of sustainability, as well as the wisdom and consequences of making complex trade-offs among rivalrous conservation goals in practice (Minteer & Miller, 2011).
Minteer, B.& T. Miller. (2011) The New Conservation Debate: Ethical Foundations, strategic trade-offs and policy opportunities. 144(3) 945-947.
This paper should be:
1.Typed, double-spaced with a 12 inch font. Acceptable font types include: Arial, Times New Roman and Calibri
2.Five pages of text in length. Length requirements do not include the cover sheet and bibliography. Points will be detracted if the paper does not meet length requirements.
3. A minimum of 5 references and a maximum of 10 references. Acceptable sources include: text, lecture, peer-reviewed articles. Web sites will not be accepted as a resource.
4.APA format and in text references are required.
Introduction 3011%The introduction for this paper includes:
1)General statements describing the focus of the paper
2)Information identifying the sections of this assignment.
Description of Issue or Concern50
29%Description of the key points of the parks v. people debate.
References are required.
Selection and Description of two charities7033% Description of at least two instances where this debate has been addressed by modern charities.
Conclusion3011%This section provides a summary or review of the key elements of the assignment including the parks v. people debate and its application to two modern charities.
Paper Requirements104%Paper meets length requirements of 5 pages
Minimum of 5 and a maximum of 10 scholarly references
A dictionary, required textbooks for this course may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment.
APA Format155%Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section or topic of the paper. one deduction for each type of APA style error.
Citations in Text104%Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.
Writing Mechanics104%Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.
Make sure to include:
You have to pick two environmental charities that are trying to do the same thing such as if you pick to protect endangered animals you would pick to charities that are trying to protect the animals.
Include in essay why it is important to protect the animals, talk about each charity and what they are trying to accomplish, charity controversy, and why what they are doing is bad and would you do the same thing.
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.[order_calculator]