Category: Assignment Help

Clearly identifies three solutions to the core problem, one of which must be from original thought and not discussed in the case. Provides supporting rationale for each solution. Clearly identifies three solutions to solve the secondary problem, one of which must be original and not discussed in the case. Provides supporting rationale for each solution.
CORE PROBLEM:the correct core problem of the GE case study is the reorganization of the entire GE company taken on by Welch.
SECONDARY: the culture had to be repaired after the restructuring of GE

Write a 2 page paper in APA format on the differences between disasters and emergencies.
See Learning Resources (specifically articles 1-2 & 7) to effectively reply to this assignment; you must draw upon 2 of the 3 articles(I have attached the 3 different articles that you must site from).

Please double-space your submission and its references.

If you decide that it is necessary to quote a source, rather than paraphrase (always preferred) you must use quotes or one other style outlined in the APA Manual (see section 6.03 on pp. 170-171). The number of citations in the body of the text must be equal in number to the entries in your reference section (see APA Manual, section 6.19, p. 179 for an exception). It is important to remember that an organization (e.g., Federal Emergency Management Agency) can be the author.

Remember, I expect you to borrow from the Learning Resources and your own research, BUT you MUST provide the appropriate citation. I cannot accept work from you that borrows ideas and direct quotes without proper citation.
Note: This professor is very strict on citations and grammar

Assignment Instructions

Instructions: Please carefully read the following assignment details in its entirety. There are many components to this particular assignment, and each component is graded. Do Not use your forum draft as your final submission. It is expected that you will revise this draft substantially- not only from the feedback you receive from peers –but also from your own informed and evolving ideas on the structure and purpose of the Toulmin argument.

This essay should be between 900 and 1000 words, excluding the required annotated bibliography.

The Toulmin essay will help you practice what you have learned so far in this course. First, you will choose a topic of interest. Make sure that you choose a topic with two opposing sides. Then, you need to research that topic in order to specify the topics scope, so it can be easily discussed in 1000 word essay. For example, you may be interested in learning more about traffic issues in the United States. However, that topic is too large to cover in a 1000 word essay. After researching peer reviewed articles that discuss US traffic issues in general, you may discover that the metro system in the District of Columbia is underfunded and underutilized. Through your research, you found that you could make a claim that more funds should be made available in order to upgrade the metro system, which would improve traffic issues in the District of Columbia. This would make for a stronger, specific argument.

The following overused topics may not be used in your essay:

gun control,
abortion,
capital punishment,
gay marriage,
gays in the military,
mandatory drug testing,
euthanasia,
childhood obesity,
women in the military,
diets (including the Paleo diet),
workout regimens (including CrossFit),
underage drinking,
dangers of smoking (including e-cigarettes and synthetic marijuana)
salaries for college athletes
and the legalization of marijuana
school uniforms

This essay must include a minimum of five sources. Three should be peer-reviewed sources, preferably from the APUS databases. From the library welcome page, click on Advanced Search at the bottom of the page and then check the \”peer reviewed\” sources box filter.

This video will hopefully clarify the term, \”peer-reviewed\”: http://youtu.be/rOCQZ7QnoN0. You may use eBooks; however, as discussed in your textbook, books generally are not as current as peer-reviewed articles. You may also use primary sources (interviews, statistics, etc); however, these primary sources should be obtained from experts within that field. If you cannot find strong sources for your chosen topic, then change your topic. If you have a question about the validity of a source, please email me, or post your question to the open forum.

Note: Consider your audience as laymen in the field with only general knowledge of your topic.

Make sure to include the following sections in your essay:

an introduction and claim,
background,
body,
and a conclusion.

Within the body of your essay, make sure to include the following in any order:

support for your claim,
opposing or alternate views,
the strengths and weaknesses of your opponents\’ claims,
and your rebuttals of their claims.

After you have written your essay, please make sure to revise the content of your essay. Lastly, be sure to edit your essay by checking grammar, format, and smaller technical details. Please make sure your essay is written in third person.

The Annotated Bibliography

An annotated Bibliography (AB) is due with your Toulmin essay. Using the MLA guide, list each source as it will appear on the Works Cited page of your essay. Summarize each source in two or three grammatically-correct sentences. These short summaries are the \”annotations.\”

The following is a sample of an \”annotated bibliography.\”

Annotated Bibliography (Centered)

Clark, Irene L. The Genre of Argument. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace, 1998. Print.

Clark\’s textbook identifies the major steps to developing a well-researched and well-written argumentative essay. Professional essays are included in the text as models.

Ward, Russ. Logical Argument in the Research Paper. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace, 1997. Print.

The instructor requires that we use at least 3 peer reviewed sources from the APUS library of the 5 sources needed. To access the library my login credentials are below.

Please ensure the essay follows the TOULMIN writing style.

Writing Assignment Charles Sumner

After reading about Bleeding Kansas In your text, read the speech Sumner gave on the floor of the Senate.

Respond to it in this way, Why did Preston Brooks beat him so mercilessly? What you need to keep in mind at this point is that, at this point in time, slavery is not only not illegal but it is a constitutional protected institution. Not only the right to own slaves, but the right to hunt down runaways from anywhere in the union and bring them back.

The point of this reading is not to make you accept slavery, but to put yourself in the shoes of that southern Plantation owner like Brooks. Was he just angry because of the attack against his uncle? Or could there have been more to it?

From the Northern Perspective, did he deserve the beating?
From the Southern Perspective, did he deserve the beating?

1- The word limit is 1000 words. Please devote 100 words to the first paragraph, outlining the purpose of this essay and the thesis statement. Devote 300 words to the second paragraph, addressing Gramsci\’s perspective on the 21st century politics and society. Devote 250 words to the third and fourth paragraphs respectively, addressing to what extent you agree with Gramsci. Devote 100 words to the conclusion.

2- Please make references to the materials I upload (at least 2). No other references are needed for this essay.

3- For this essay, please be \’argumentative\’ rather than descriptive.

4- Please finish it as soon as possible.

Explain the task that Rousseau sets himself in Social Contract on the basis of:
the Introduction to Book I (p.141);
Chapter I of Book I (p.141); and
Rousseaus formulation of the problem in Book I Ch. V, p.148: Find a form free as before.
In your answer be sure to indicate how Rousseau situates himself in relation to Hobbes.

The requirement … Write a 3 page essay (in APA format) in which you \”Conceptualize an innovation that you believe would improve the healthcare system. Describe how this could happen, key stakeholders needed to make this happen, and the desirable outcomes that would result.\”

I would like the paper to discuss one health for pets and people here in the United State to enhance health and wellness for all …. we are all are basically the same … veins, bones, muscle, etc …

Suggestion … One Health shall be achieved through:
1. Joint educational efforts between human medical, veterinary medical schools, and schools of public health and the environment;
2. Joint communication efforts in journals, at conferences, and via allied health networks;
3. Joint efforts in clinical care through the assessment, treatment and prevention of cross-species disease transmission;
4. Joint cross-species disease surveillance and control efforts in public health;
5. Joint efforts in better understanding of cross-species disease transmission through comparative medicine and environmental research;
6. Joint efforts in the development and evaluation of new diagnostic methods, medicines and vaccines for the prevention and control of diseases across species and;
7. Joint efforts to inform and educate political leaders and the public sector through accurate media publications.

Sources are not required however these sites describe what one health is …

http://www.onehealthinitiative.com/

https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/Reference/Pages/One-Health94.aspx

https://www.facebook.com/pg/OneHealthforPeoplePetsandPartners/about/?ref=page_internal

I.
PLEASE ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS BELOW (1-10). There is also a bonus question.
FOR EVERY QUESTION, MORE THAN ONE ANSWER MAY BE CORRECT.
2T = Lockes Second Treatise on Government
DI = Rousseaus Discourse on the Origins of Inequality
SC = Rousseaus Social Contract

1. Lockes concern about defending property on the basis of the primacy of self-preservation in the Essays on the Law of Nature are absent in 2T because
A. he has dropped the theological framework of the Essays in 2T n favour of natural reason
B. there is a new theory of labour in 2T that avoids the problem he saw in the Essays
C. he has dropped the concept of the Law of Nature in 2T

2. Lockes account of political obligation in 2T is grounded in
A. the need to avoid a Hobbesian war of all against all
B. ends that individuals value and can only be secured by the state
C. norms that are embedded in nature and accessible to observation and reason.

3. Ryan (1996) argues against MacPherson that Lockes state is a joint-stock company, because
A. the standard of living is raised for everyone when the state secures property rights
B. everyone has some material property to be protected by the state
C. everyone is a shareholder who holds the same shares as other citizens
D. Lockes concept of property is wide enough to include the entire population

4. Lockes account of the social contract in 2T is contradictory because it depends on the transfer of natural rights that are inalienable.
A. TRUE
B. FALSE

5. Lockes executive power of natural law (2T 7-13) entails that
A. everyone in the state of nature has the right to kill a murderer
B. in the state of nature, men will use their reason to judge appropriate punishments
C. in the state of nature, the law of nature on its own is insufficient

6. Like Hobbes, Rousseau contends in DI that
A. a legitimate form of rule must be grounded in a doctrine of Natural Law or Right
B. Natural Law must be suited to human nature
C. Natural Law can only be known through the use of reason

7. The Preface to DI tells us that
A. Understanding the origins of inequality requires self-knowledge
B. Self-knowledge is possible because of the progress of knowledge
C. Self-knowledge requires separating what is original from what is artificial in human beings
D. The state of nature has a purely critical-diagnostic function in DI

8. Which of the following characterise amour de soi:
A. The capacity to identify with the suffering of other sentient beings
B. A passion that is shared with animals
C. Sociability
D. A capacity for hatred and resentment
E. Living in the opinion of others
F. A passion that presupposes and is directed by reason

9. In DI Rousseau criticises Hobbes for
A. reading the desire for self-preservation into the state of nature
B. mistaking amour de soi for amour propre
C. reading social passions into natural man
D. making natural man irrational
E. ignoring pitie

10. According to Riley, Rousseau criticised modern contract theory because
A. it relies on individual consent
B. it condones private interest
C. it neglects to ask what we ought to be obligated to

BONUS QUESTION
According to Rousseau (SC: Book I Ch V & VI),
A. The social contract presupposes the existence of a people
B. Any political act presupposes public deliberation