Category: Assignment Help

use scholarly sources.

all the necessary instructions and information will attach to the file section
Abstract and Introduction
A1) Abstract: A clearly stated aim for the experiment) (2), how aims were achieved (sub experiments summarised) (2) and what the final results were (2)
I1) Definition of voltage, current and resistance (3). Description of series and parallel circuits (4). Explanation of how voltage and current varies in series and parallel circuit (4). Description of Kirchhoffs 1st law (2) and 2nd law (2). Description Ohms law (2) including the equation (2).
6
19
Method
M1) Original correctly labelled (3) diagrams of the experimental set ups (3).
M2) An original account of each of the procedures written as a paragraph (4) and in the 3rd person and past tense (2).
6
6

Results

Series Circuits
R1a) Table of nominal resistance against measured resistance including % difference (2). (Calculations shown in Appendix). Table includes units (1) and correct value for total measured and calculated resistance (calculations shown in Appendix).
R2a) Table of measured value of V, I and R including % difference (2). (Calculations shown in Appendix). Table includes units (1) R1b) Correctly calculated values for the potential difference across each resistor. (Calculations using Ohms law shown in the appendix).
Parallel Circuits
R3) Table of measured value of V, I and R and calculated values for V, I and R (3). (Calculations shown in Appendix).

3
3
3
-1-
Foundation Engineering Science
Discussion
Conclusion
Series circuits
D1) Based on the results, comments on the relationship between V, I and R in a series circuit (3). Does this agree with the theory (2)?
D2) Discussion of the percentage difference between the total nominal resistances and total measured resistances (3). Explanation of the reasons for any difference between the total nominal resistances and total measured resistances (2).
D3) Comments on the value of the measured potential difference across each resistance compared to the calculated p.d across each resistor (3). Discussion of the reasons for any difference between the theoretical (calculated) values and measured values of VS and I in series circuit (4).
Parallel circuits
D4) Bases on the results, comment on the relation between the measured V and I in a parallel circuit (3). Does this agree with the theory (2)?
D5) Comments on the value of the total measured resistance compared to the calculated total resistance (3). Discussion of the reasons for any difference between the theoretical (calculated) values and measured values of V and I (4).
D6) Improvements to the method in order to gain a more accurate/precise result (4).
C1) A summary of what was found (6):

5
5
7
5
7
4 6

References and Appendix
Ref) Correct reference section (1). Correctly cited in text (1). App1) Calculations for table R1 (3). App2) Calculations for table R2 (4). App3) Calculations for table R3 (4).

13

Presentation

Pres) All word processed, graphs drawn in Excel, clearly structured (1).
2
Instruction files

_e2.pdf(730,88 KiB)
e2_marcking_scheme_.pdf(64,60 KiB)

Based on the pd f file and the financials you can have to fill the excel report.

Remember, respond individually to the questions in this post.
Functional Assessment and Treatment Questions
Moran, D.J., & Maillot, R.W. (Eds.; 2004). Evidence-based educational methods. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.

1. Haley(2012) discusses several reasons often given for not conducting a functional analysis (FA).

(a) Pick three reasons personally that would likely prevent or have prevented conducting an FA.

(b) If you decided to not conduct a FA, what other options do you have for determining a function of a behavior?

2. Not much has been published about the hypothesis-driven model of problem behavior (Rep, Felice, Barton, 1998) discussed in teh Carr (1994) article since it was written. However, for some cases, it seems particularly well-suited. In fact, there are many cases to suggest that just because you conduct an FA does not mean that you have conclusively determined the function of a behavior(s). What you can say is that for the environmental variables you have introduced and controlled for, and under a certain type of conditions which a function was tested, that it appears that \”x\” is a function of \”y\”. Which is why Carr, and any good behavior analyst, recommends making sure you \”get it right\” when you initially do your indirect assessment. Because if the context isn\’t right, you may not have the correct discriminate stimuli, motivating operations, or schedule of reinforcement to occasion the behavior in an analogue setting (i.e. clinic, classroom) as it naturally occurs.

(a) What do you think are some of the problems of using the hypothesis-driven model as a mode of assessment for making conclusions about function(s) of a behavior?

3. Tiger, Hanley, Bruzek (2008) provide summary recommendations for conducting FCT. In the clinic, training a functoinal communicatoin response (FCR) as part of FCT is relativley easy (the hard part is thinning the schedule of reinforcement!). Often it is easy because in a clinic you control the variables (i.e. when they are introduced, their form, etc.)

(a) Given some of the details, give some thought to and name three obstacles that you think would be most problematic when conducting FCT in a natural environment setting (i.e. home, home-classroom, work, etc.).

I have done a presentation on this topic of ethical dilemmas of eliminating mosquitos in Africa due to the fact that fish support livelihood of 3% of Africans and 2% of economy as well as source of good for the people. Now I need ideas writing an essay on the direct consequences of this elimination, the stake holders abs people affected, and possible solutions or alternative(s). The disease carried by mosquitos is serious, however we must consider and weigh the ethical nature of eliminating mosquitos and its impact on the African economy and people as its egg larva are a primary source for fish. Am focusing on ethical issues of this topic with support by research, not drawing a conclusion just presenting a compelling argument that this is highly ethical problem with myriad of consequences.
My current sources and you could add another good one possibly: 1. Taylor, B., & Williams, H. (2016, January 28). How Zika Spreads. Retrieved May 17, 2016, from http://graphics.wsj.com/how-zika-spreads/
2. FAO Doc. No. 1093 at 1-82 (2015). FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1093 FIPS/C1093 (En)
3. Beisel, U., & Bote, C. (2013). The Flying Public Health Tool: Genetically Modified Mosquitoes and Malaria Control. Science as Culture, 22(1), 38-60. doi:10.1080/09505431.2013.776364
4. Oxitec, Oxitec Research Inst. (2016). More on the science: How does oxitec make genetically modified mosquitoes? Press release. Retrieved from http://www.oxitec.com/oxitec-video/more-on-the-science-how-does-oxitec-make-genetically-modified-mosquitoes/

The purpose of the observation assignment is for you to watch and identify consistent pattern of behaviors amongst people. This specific observation asks that you focus on behaviors related to conformity. The definition of conformity and examples of informative behaviors can be found in your text and as part of your reading assignment for this week. As you write your short paper, please make certain to integrate what you have read with what you have observed. Failure to integrate and support your findings will result in a loss of a letter grade.

It is always wise to maintain notes when completing an observational project, please use the information below to guide you as you collect your notes.

1. Based on your assumption, what is the relationship of the people of which are observing?

2. What was the pre conforming behavior or statement? In other words, what happened before the other individual demonstrated a conforming behavior.

3. What was that conforming behavior?

4. As a measure of self analysis, what drew you to that particular relationship?

5. During the time of your observation, did you notice any of the relationship that demonstrated conformity? What was that behavior? How different was it then the initially expressed conforming behavior?

In two pages (not including the title and reference page), report what you found in an essay format (do not forget to integrate your reading). Once you have explained the observed conforming behaviors, comparing those behaviors to your personal relationships. Highlight any similarities or the similarities between the observed behaviors and your personal behaviors in your personal relationships. This short paper should have a title page, a reference page, and should comply with all APA formatting regulations.

Assigned Reading: Chapters 5 and 6
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., & Cialdini, R. B. (2015). Social Psychology (6th ed., p. 41). San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education, Inc.

this is a group assignment, in my part, i just do part of part 2, for my duty is to do the hedge in the lower global commodity prices of steel, and fluctuations in the Australian dollar. (you need to justify your choice, why to hedge(advantage and limitation) The Bluescope Steel company is that we chose. There are more details in the instruction.
Instruction files

derivatives-instrucion.docx(23,77 KiB)

1-Please check the attachment, and carefully read the instructions.
3- The writer has to send me the article(s) before starting the work.
3-You Must be explicit about how the article(s) relate to theoretical frameworks.
———-
Added on 20.05.2016 20:16
Please be aware that the assignment is focusing in somehow on using sociology theories to explain topics.
Instruction files

this_assignment_will_identify_1_3_article.pdf(63,25 KiB)