Category: Assignment Help

1. Explain why “giant magnetoresistance” is considered a quantum mechanical phenomena and why it may be classified as “spintronics”. What is its major application? This will require a bit of research on your part. Make sure you list references you used to formulate your answer. DO NOT simply quote Wikipedia!! This will get you few points. (10 points.) 2. In the conclusions of the paper by Sun et. al., it says:“In view of applications, our view is that two-terminal devices such as wires, rectifiers and multivalued logic single-molecule devices can be expected to emerge as the most feasible route towards molecular devices.” (pg 7403, 3full paragraph).Based on the information that the authors present in their paper, why do you believe this is their view? Support your answer with at least three quotes from the content of the paper. Give the page and paragraph number like I did above. (10 points) 3. In the paper by Avouris et. al., a carbon nanotube device is described in Figure 18, where the Vvs. Vcharacteristic is shown (an enlarged copy is attached). In the paper by Stan et. al., one of the reasons digital electronics is so useful is the ability to “reject noise” (Section IV, Part A, pg. 1946). (25 pts. Total) a. For the device in the Avouris paper, if Vis saturated at its largest positive value, what is the minimum change in V() that would cause the inverter to switch so that Vis negative? Show on the figure how you arrived at your number. (10 pts)b. What percentage is this voltage change () of the total possible voltage swing ofV(voltage range from highest to lowest voltage). Show on the attached figure how you arrived at and the total voltage swing for V. (5 pts.)c. According to the criteria that Stan et. al. quotes as needed “noise rejection” for digital electronics (make sure you identify this criteria in your solution), does the carbon nanotube device associated with this figure meet the criteria? Explain. (10 pts.) 4. What will be the ultimate factor that decides what, if any, quantum electronics technology succeeds MIS technology sometime in the future? (5 points) (Hint: it is possible that this question can be correctly answered with one word!)

Project description
The requirement details please see the Attached File. In order to answer the question A well, you need to focus on critically evaluating relevant accounting theory and practice involving your chosen topic. While in the question B, you need to focus on comparing the differences of the two companies (Next plc and H&M) chosen. Your analysis and comparison of the companies should be focused on your chosen topic.

Three copies of this assignment have been placed for you. Similarity and plagiarize should be avoided. High quality paper is needed.
———-
Added on 28.04.2016 23:55
Regarding the part b, the tutor said if you have chosen tax then you need to compare the way tax is accounted for by the two companies, using the theories and frameworks you have discussed in Part a.

Hope this helps.
Instruction files

requirement_details1.zip(1,65 MiB)
File uploaded by writer

order_id_1452454-_revision.docx (27,56 KiB)
Uploaded on 07-05-2016, 15:59. Downloaded by customer on 08-05-2016, 11:28
order_id_1452454_final_copy.docx (28,55 KiB)
Downloaded by customer on 07-05-2016, 01:14
order_id_1452454.docx (28,63 KiB)
Old files
order_id_1452454_final_copy.2.docx(28,55 KiB)
The paper has been off-topic!! Nothing meets the requirement. Did you check the requirement before you doing the paper??? The chosen companies are Next Plc and H&M. The part A requires you to critically evaluate relevant accounting theory and practice involving your chosen topic. What you did were off-topic. The part B requires you to compare the way tax is accounted for by the two companies, using the theories and frameworks you have discussed in Part a. What you did were off-topic as well. Also, the references you cited in this paper were very limited. Did not meet the requirements of 30 Journal papers. The most serious issue is that the references you cited in this paper were the same with the other order you are doing!!! You have to redone the paper within 24 hours. This is the only one chance I can give for you. I will ask for changing other writer to redo this paper if the paper still does not meet the requirement after this revision. Also, I would ask for changing other writer to redo the another order of this assignment as well if I can’t receive a high quality paper after this revision. Details check the attached file in the message board.

Project description
The requirement details please see the Attached File. In order to answer the question A well, you need to focus on critically evaluating relevant accounting theory and practice involving your chosen topic. While in the question B, you need to focus on comparing the differences of the two companies (Tesco plc and Carrefour) chosen. Your analysis and comparison of the companies should be focused on your chosen topic.

Three copies of this assignment have been placed for you. Similarity and plagiarize should be avoided. High quality paper is needed.
———-
Added on 28.04.2016 23:53
Regarding the part b, the tutor said if you have chosen tax then you need to compare the way tax is accounted for by the two companies, using the theories and frameworks you have discussed in Part a.

Hope this helps.
Instruction files

requirement_details.zip(1,98 MiB)
File uploaded by writer

order_id_1452459-_revision_1.docx (29,66 KiB)
Uploaded on 08-05-2016, 06:42. Downloaded by customer on 08-05-2016, 10:54
order_id_1452459.docx (33,47 KiB)
Downloaded by customer on 07-05-2016, 01:16
Old files
order_id_1452459.1.docx(33,47 KiB)
The paper has been off-topic!! Nothing meets the requirement. Did you check the requirement before you doing the paper??? The chosen companies in this paper are Tesco plc and Carrefour. The part A requires you to critically evaluate relevant accounting theory and practice involving your chosen topic. What you did were off-topic. The part B requires you to compare the way tax is accounted for by the two companies, using the theories and frameworks you have discussed in Part a. What you did were off-topic as well. Also, the references you cited in this paper were very limited. Did not meet the requirements of 30 Journal papers. The most serious issue is that the references you cited in this paper were the same with the other order you are doing!!! You have to redone the paper within 24 hours. This is the only one chance I can give for you. I will ask for changing other writer to redo this paper if the paper still does not meet the requirement after this revision. Also, I would ask for changing other writer to redo the another order of this assignment as well if I can not receive a high quality paper after this revision. Details check the attached file in the message board.

Your final paper for this class will be to write a 5-6 page research paper that critically evaluates a Wikipedia page on a topic related to our class content. What does this mean? You will pick your own topic, subject to my approval. You may choose to write on anything we’ve studied so far, or another topic on working people in the U.S. that falls before the Civil War. My suggestion is that you choose a person or event, though other types of topics may work as well. Your starting point is the Wikipedia page for that topic. You will analyze the Wikipedia page in a couple of different ways: first, you’ll use the library’s “Five Criteria for Evaluating Web Pages” to evaluate the page. Second, you’ll do your own research on that topic and compare and contrast the way that various other kinds of sources cover the material compared to Wikipedia. What kind of research do I have to do? You need to do research in the library databases. One of the goals of the assignment is to get you thinking about how different types of information resources can be helpful to you in different ways. You need to use 5-6 different sources of information that you have accessed via the library – articles, books, ebooks, etc. – including: At least one academic journal article.One specialized encyclopedia article. (No more than one reference source will count toward your total of five sources. Reference sources are encyclopedias, and anything you find in the Gale Virtual Reference Library is a reference source.)At least three different types of sources (books, academic journals, encyclopedias, newspaper articles, etc.)Timeline: You will be developing this essay over several weeks, and there will be a variety of assignments that should prepare you for submitting the final essay. Details for each of these assignments will be posted separately in Etudes. The deadlines for the project follow: Why are we doing this? I hope this assignment will help you to improve your skills in: Finding information using library research tools.Reading and analyzing different kinds of written information sources.Writing clear and persuasive arguments supported by research.These skills connect to skills that employers demand (to connect to our theme of “working people.” :)) See #s 3, 4, and 5 on the list on the following page:  I also hope that this will be an interesting assignment. It will give you an opportunity to explore a topic you’ve found interesting so far. I’m also really interested to hear what you find: I’ve read and thought a lot about Wikipedia as a teacher, and so I’m excited to hear your findings.  The Details: Length: 5-6 full pages. If your essay is less than 5 pages, you will be penalized: 7 points per half page too short, rounded to the nearest half page.Formatting: Essays should be typed in double-spaced, 12-point, Times New Roman font, with max margins of 1.25” on sides and 1” top and bottom. If you mess with the margins or spacing or font sizing, you will get penalized for page length. I’m kind of a stickler on this, because writing more takes more time, and I want you to take time to write!Cover page: Please include a cover page with this assignment, with your name, a title for the essay, the date, and the section number. The cover page is page “0” and does not count in your page count for the assignment. Because you have a cover page, you do not need to have a new header on page 1, except for whatever header is appropriate for the type of fake document you are creating.Citations: You need a bibliography and footnotes for your essay, formatted in Chicago Style. If I don’t mention it in the next week, remind me to do an in-class workshop on this!

fORMAT FOR WRITTEN CASE ANALYSIS Sections of the Analysis (in order):  Executive Summary  Problem Definition  Analysis of Alternatives  Plan Development Executive Summary This section should define the problem, state the chosen alternative, and briefly explain why the chosen alternative is the superior alternative. The Executive Summary should not contain background material from the case. Write the Executive Summary for your audience – the executives of the company. They are, of course, well-informed about the situation. This section will usually be only 2 or 3 paragraphs in length. Problem Statement and Statement of Alternatives Adequately and appropriately defining the problem is the key to the case analysis. A problem definition should be framed as a decision to be made. Therefore, “sales have fallen off” is not a properly defined problem. The problem should not be defined so narrowly that good alternative courses of action are not considered. Therefore, “should we increase advertising” is too narrowly defined to result in a thoughtfully considered decision. The problem definition should contain three key elements: decision objectives; success measures; and decision constraints. For example: how can we maintain our quality brand image (objective); and regain our lost market share (success measure); given limited funds for advertising and sales promotion (constraint)? This section should identify the alternative courses of action to be investigated. This section should also list the major dimensions, or states of nature in a decision theory framework, of the decision (i.e., those factors on which the choice of an alternative will largely depend). These states of nature are uncertain and, for the most part, are uncontrollable: competitor actions, consumer needs and response, and turns in the economy are examples. The potential payoff of any alternative depends on the “true” state of nature. This section will most likely be about 1 page in length. Analysis of Alternatives This section may contain qualitative as well as quantitative analyses. In a decision theory sense, this section seeks to calculate the expected payoff of each alternative. Therefore, you must sift through the case information to find those pieces of information relevant to the decision to be made. Here, you are really constructing the states of nature, estimating probabilities of the state of nature, determining cell payoffs, and calculating the expected values of each alternative. It is proper to place actual calculation, exhibits, etc. in the appendices and simply refer to your findings in the body of the paper. This section will ultimately identify the chosen alternative strategy or course of action. This section will normally be 2 to 3 pages in length. Plan Development Once the alternative strategy is selected, you must develop a plan for its implementation. Basically, this involves specifying the marketing mix to be employed. This section will be 1 to 2 pages in length.

The topic of your project needs to be a contemporary societal problem, such as healthcare reform, immigration reform, privacy rights, euthanasia, First Amendment Rights, stem cell research, capital punishment, corporate prisons, legalizing drugs, ageism, animal rights, cloning, prayer in schools, racial profiling, recycling/conservation, sexism, outsourcing jobs, workplace bullying, etc. The topic must focus on a single aspect, as in “How far do corporations intrude into the private lives of their employers?” or “The social costs of financing the distribution of custom-designed drugs.” You may suggest another topic to use, but the instructor must approve the topic during the Week Two Discussion.The Final Research Project will present research relating the responsibilities of a critical thinker to contemporary society. In this assignment, you will do the following:You must take on the perspective of your major field of study and explain in your paper what that perspective is and how it informs your view of the topic. The topics listed above are far too broad to write about in 10–12 pages (3,300–3,900 words). Instead, you must choose a narrowly defined thesis and approach it from the perspective of your field.If you are an economics major, and you are interested in immigration reform, you should approach a very specific aspect of immigration reform through the lens of economic theory and practice. A specific thesis question would not be, “How does illegal immigration influence the U.S. economy?” One could write thousands of pages on such a topic. Instead, a better question would be, “How do illegal immigrant hotel workers in Chicago impact the economy of Northern Illinois?” You would then want to do the research and determine the positive and negative impacts they have, ultimately trying to conclude how illegal immigration in this area should be approached ethically.It is important that you start your research early in this course. Try to find the most important contemporary questions and theories in your field of study and then align the most important questions with a very specific aspect of the general topics above. For example, if you are a psychology major, you might want to start thinking within the realm of healthcare reform or aspects of mental health and criminality in the prison system.You must present a complete argument, including a major claim with at least five points of evidence, information, or data that will prove the claim.After you have defined the problem and created an argument about how one ought to respond to the issue, you need to explain the ethical outcomes of the position you have taken. This should again be in relation to the field of study in which you are working. There might be different ethical outcomes that result from your analysis. For example, going back to the example issue above, from an economic standpoint, illegal immigrants might contribute positively to the economy of Northern Illinois in a specific number of ways. Thus, an economist who believes that positive impact to the economy is the greatest good would say that one should promote the use of illegal immigrants. However, because these workers are often paid less than others and eliminate jobs that could be done by residents of Chicago, there could be other negative ethical outcomes that would outweigh the positive impacts to the economy. It is your goal to draw out the ethical implications of your thesis and explain the underlying rationale that is the foundation for your claim that one action is better than another.The Final Research Project may be presented as a formal research paper (essay format), a PowerPoint presentation, a video, or a podcast equivalent to a minimum of 10 – 12 pages in APA format (approximately 3,300 – 3,900 typewritten words, excluding title page and reference pages). Written essays must adhere to all APA formatting standards and requirements, as outlined in the .PowerPoint presentations must include the full text (at least 3,300 words) in the speaker notes portion of the slides, with appropriate citations, and full reference pages. PowerPoint presentations must adhere to the basic principles of  and must include citations and references according to APA standards and requirements.Videos and podcasts must include a full transcript, in APA format, including appropriate in-text citations and a references page.There must be no more than 15% quoted content in the body of your essay. All quoted material must bear quotation marks and a full quotation citation.You must have a summary conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the project, presenting the major point of the essay and the evidence supporting that point.The content body of the project must be 3,300 words or more. The word count does not include anything in the title page, running header, or reference list. It is expected that you meet all logistical requirements of this paper.

Due Week 10 and worth 100 pointsAs a way of experiencing the Humanities beyond your classroom, computer, and textbook, you are asked to do a certain type of “cultural activity” that fits well with our course and then report on your experience.   Your instructor will require you to propose an activity and get instructor approval before you do it and report on it (students should look for any instructions in that respect). Every effort should be made to ensure that this is a hands-on experience (not a virtual one), that this activity fits the HUM 112 class well, and that the activity is of sufficient quality for this university course. The two (2) key types of activities are a museum visit or a performance. : This must not be a report on the same activity (and certainly not the same report) as done for another class, like HUM 111. For instance, one might go to the same museum as done for HUM 111, but this HUM 112 report will focus on entirely different works and displays. : Submit your cultural activity choice to the instructor for approval before the end of Week 5 (earlier is even better). Look for guidance from the instructor for how or where to make your proposal. You may also seek advice from your instructor (provide your town / state or zip code) for a good activity in your general area. : If a student is unable to attend a cultural event in person due to circumstances beyond the student’s control, then the instructor will recommend an alternate event / activity for the student to “attend” online. The “virtual” event / activity is usually only for students who, due to their physical location, cannot possibly attend an event / activity in person; typically, these students are stationed overseas or have no means of transportation. If you believe that you have a legitimate reason for attending a “virtual” activity, you must contact the instructor no later than Week 5 for your request to be considered.  Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric .

Judgement Argument (Fact and Value thesis paper)Step one is to choose a subject.  The problem that you perceive as an author is that people don’t agree with what you believe is true and don’t concur with your opinion on one of the following subjects.  You will be arguing that the first part of your thesis is true and the opinion in the second part of the thesis is better than your audience’s, trying to get the audience to change their minds to agree with your entire thesis.  Choose one of the following subjects to create a fact and aesthetic, or moral, based evaluation.Purpose of College education  (Chapter 4)                                           Death Penalty (Chap.5)Genetic Modification (Chap. 8)Social Networking (Chap. 7)       Drug legalization (Chap. 6)           Immigration (Chap. 9)Public service (Chap. 10)               Student loans forgiveness (Chap. 11)Step two is to construct the thesis.  Choose a problem in the topic you have chosen and decide what you want to say about it.  The thesis sentence needs to be written like this template:    (e.g.  .  The paper would then examine the amount of hate crimes as a result of cyber bullying [quantitative research] and then define the word “unethical” and match censorship to it [value statements]).  Write the quantitative statement piece first and then choose your value word(s) for the second part of the thesis.  I want you to use an opinion word which is very vague and can be defined a number of ways during your paper.  This will hopefully give you more freedom to play with definition methods.  You may use words from my value word list used for the Evaluation paper.Once you construct your thesis, step three is to write the pro body. Find to support the beginning, quantitative section of the thesis. .   In the next part of the pro body, you need to define your value word using at .  Then you need to match the subject to the definition using .  Other pro research may also be used in any section of the pro body. For step four, you need a  containing that disagrees with your thesis.  .The paper needs standard introduction and conclusion sections and a Works Cited page. The paper length should be around six-seven pages, typed and double spaced.